The Birthday Party School of Literary Appreciation
Have you heard enough of
deconstruction, narratology, semiotics, transgresssive transgendering,
flatulitics? It’s much worse than the
older labelling terms and rules—comparatively simple nonsense like iambs and
trochees, sonnet forms, heroic couplet
—which were used as a substitute for
engaging with literature. But both the
new “theoretical” nonsense and the older formalist labels are worthless, and
worse: they distract us. We should forget all the old literary
arithmetic stuff, and we must refuse, abjure, denounce, and in the future
simply ignore all literary “theory” and the literary criticism that uses such. Literature has value—and neither it nor its
readers need literary theory or literary criticism—or rules.
The world was much better—and we were
much better and more useful—when the study of literature meant reading for understanding
and appreciation. Our aim was modest and
respectable then: we served art, rather
than shit on it, and we read literature in order to learn more about life.
Literature has value, and there are
good reasons why we should study it.
Criticism has its place, of course:
we should all read critically, thoughtfully, analytically. But what most literary critics do is—at best—an
irrelevant elaboration of the footnote, a sort of self-important
distractionism
.
.
There was once an important
footnote—and it is a most important bit of Keats criticism. Douglas Bush wrote—in a footnote to the old
Riverside edition of John Keats—“When Keats writes about ‘thinking,’ he means a
sympathetic understanding of the human condition.”
The Birthday Party School of Literary
Appreciation is dedicated to reading poems, novels, stories, and plays. And essays, biographies, and autobiographies. You can attend—or start your own branch. Why not begin with Keats? Friday, 31 October 2014 will be the 219th
birthday of John Keats. Call a meeting—or just invite
your friends. Read and talk about some
of Keats’s poems. You might even refer
to his letters. And celebrate—with
perhaps “a draught of vintage”—those poems, and their author.
Bert
Hornback
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten