SPEAKING OF TONGUES
“Speaking in tongues” is an old trick. The ancient Greeks must have done it, since
they used the word: a word for babbling
with the tongue. “Babble” is either an onamatopoeic word like “blab” or
“burble”—a nonsense sound—or it has as its source the Tower of Babel in the
Western Bible. Jesus’s apostles
supposedly spoke in tongues when the Holy Ghost sat on their heads on
Pentecost. In later Christian times, it has been associated with inspired talk,
presumably in a language only God can understand, and is reverenced.
Religions
often reverence things that can’t be understood: like Athena being born out of Zeus’s
forehead, or the virgin birth of Jesus, or the Christian idea of three persons
in the one god. Those are all
imaginable, even if they are illogical or unnatural. But speaking in tongues—babble—is well beyond
that. It doesn’t communicate anything,
and nobody ever bothers to write it down.
Still, in some traditions it is reverenced.
But
speaking of tongues, maybe we should think about the ways
the animal world—not including humans, for the most part—speaks with tongues.
Humans
use their tongues to turn the noises that breathing and the voice box make into
various different sounds, which become words and language. And human have become clever enough to
translate those mostly tongue-differentiated and tongue-controlled sounds into
symbols, and sometimes to write them out.
Many children use their tongues—unconsciously—when they are learning to
write, making lingual gestures which might be linguistic gestures
Western
languages share an “alphabet”—which, as a word, must be the most absurd bit of
babble ever recorded. It gets its name
from the first two letters for the ancient
Greeks, alpha and beta.
There is no reason, of course, why they should be the first two
letters. “O”—or “OM”--has a long
tradition of being considered the first sound, the original word of the
God. “I” is a straight line, a simple part
of the circle: it might have been a good
place to start, especially as it is the me-word. And all language comes from a self. It isn’t a separate creation.
The
oldest of the Western languages, Sanskrit, from maybe five or six thousand
years ago, has a very carefully logical ordering of sounds and the letters that
represent them. (In the West, with a
nice blend of ignorance and arrogance, we call the Sanskrit letters an “alphabet.”) And the Korean language has a similar
ordering of its sounds, thanks to King Sejong, a fifteenth century king, who
learned the Sanskrit lettering system from Buddhist monks in China.
But animals—or some of them, anyway—speak with their tongues,
or with their wet noses. Being kissed
by a dog may be sloppy, but it’s reliable.
Dogs don’t do Judas kisses. And
though cats licking each other at bath time isn’t kissing, it is both friendly
and seemingly pleasurable both for the licker and the licked.
Humans
say that snakes are not trustworthy:
they “speak with forked tongues.”
But snakes lie on their
bellies, not with their tongues. Snakes aren’t talkers at all. Human tongues are the ones that lie—so why do
we malign reptiles for having forked tongues?
When
humans say that someone speaks “with a crooked tongue,” they mean that the
crooked-tongued person can’t be trusted.
Although there are untrustworthy animals of various kinds, we don’t
identify them as being so by their having crooked tongues. Even monkeys don’t use their tongues to play
tricks.
With
the exception of humans, the animal world seems to have honest, trustworthy
tongues. Does our more elaborate intelligence enable us
to misuse our tongues? Sure. It’s not just a matter of our giving false
kisses. Look at all the dishonest things
we say!
“I
love you” frequently doesn’t mean what it says.
Indeed: as saying go it’s about
as trustworthy as “I O U,” among humans.
And the saying “Speak softly, but
carry a big stick” doesn’t suggest that what we say is worth much, or to be
trusted. And “Telling lies,” we say, “is
easier than telling truths.” Our language is so full of sayings that
promote dishonesty that we should probably call tongue a dirty word.
Speaking of tongues, perhaps what we should say is that maybe we would be better off if we didn't.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten